Volume 43 No. 2
Closely Held Corporations: An Intersection of Business Law,
and Ethics Orrin K. (Skip) Ames III
Understanding the Impact of Inadequate Feedback: A Means to
Reduce Law Student Psychological Distress, Increase
Motivation, and Improve Learning Outcomes Paula J. Manning
The Socially Unpopular Verdict: A Post-Casey Anthony Analysis
Why Are Chapter 13 Debtors Still "Standing" in their Battle for
Trustee's Avoidance Powers?: A Call to Resolve the Current
Criminal Law—Habeas Corpus— State Jury Decision Reigns
Supreme in Determination of Sufficiency of Evidence for
Federal Habeas Relief. Cavazos v. Smith, 132 S. Ct. 2 (2011).
Constitutional Law—Confrontation Clause—Expert
Testimony of Non-Testifying Analyst's DNA Report is Non-
Testimonial and Does Not Violate the Confrontation
Clause, But Suprem Court Fails to Define Testimonial."
Williams v. Illinois, 132 S. Ct. 2221 (2012).