Volume 43 No. 2
2012-2013
ARTICLES
Closely Held Corporations: An Intersection of Business Law,
and Ethics Orrin K. (Skip) Ames III
Understanding the Impact of Inadequate Feedback: A Means to
Reduce Law Student Psychological Distress, Increase
Motivation, and Improve Learning Outcomes Paula J. Manning
COMMENT
The Socially Unpopular Verdict: A Post-Casey Anthony Analysis
of the Need to Reform Juror Privacy Policy
Why Are Chapter 13 Debtors Still "Standing" in their Battle for
Trustee's Avoidance Powers?: A Call to Resolve the Current
Circuit Split
CASENOTES
Criminal Law—Habeas Corpus— State Jury Decision Reigns
Supreme in Determination of Sufficiency of Evidence for
Federal Habeas Relief. Cavazos v. Smith, 132 S. Ct. 2 (2011).
Constitutional Law—Confrontation Clause—Expert
Testimony of Non-Testifying Analyst's DNA Report is Non-
Testimonial and Does Not Violate the Confrontation
Clause, But Suprem Court Fails to Define Testimonial."
Williams v. Illinois, 132 S. Ct. 2221 (2012).
